09:20:57 From Antoni Montoya : Code Enforcement: Revise the photometric plan to comply with IDO §5-8(F)(4)(c) for light trespass, and add CCT and CRI values to the plan per IDO §5-8(E)(2)(a). 09:25:09 From Hannah Shea-Parks & Recreation : Parks and Recreation outstanding comments for case #1: -An updated landscape plan must be provided. Street trees are required along Bridge Blvd SW no less than 20’ from back of curb and spaced 25’ O.C. Tree species must be approved by City Forestry. -Details showing the wall design along Battan Dr. must be provided and must be approved by Parks and Recreation due to adjacency to a City park. -Compliance with 5-6(G) Screening of Mechanical Equipment and Support Areas, must be confirmed with Parks and Recreation department. 09:27:45 From Jay Rodenbeck : Item #1, PR-2024-010887 has been moved to the end of the agenda 09:29:05 From David Gutierrez : Water Authority Conditions, PR-2024-010887: Pro Rata must be paid prior to final sign off. Update the site plan to call out public vs. private infrastructure. Show proposed location and easement of the proposed water meter. 09:30:28 From Jay Rodenbeck : The current case being discuss is item #2, PR-2025-020137 09:41:26 From Scott Anderson : Replying to "Item #1, PR-2024-010..." Parking count. There are 30 townhouses with 2 car garages = 60 spaces. There are 151 surface parking spaces including HC spaces. The total parking count is 211 spaces provided. 09:52:41 From Antoni Montoya : Code Enforcement 1. Landscaping: Confirm that trees within the Coors Blvd setback meet IDO §3-6(D)(7). Note on the landscape plan that: • Landscaping will not exceed the view plane (§3-6(D)(7)(a)); and • Tree species have “see-through” foliage and are placed to maintain eastern views (§3-6(D)(7)(b)). 2. Parking Calculations: If using the Office/General Retail rate (3.5 spaces/1,000 sq ft), clearly state the proposed use in the parking calculation. 3. Lighting: Provide light fixture detail sheets demonstrating compliance with IDO §5-8, including cut-off angle, CCT, CRI, and pole heights (§5-8(E)(2)). Demonstrate compliance with IDO Table 5-8-5 (Total Site Lumens) and note on the photometric plan. 09:53:51 From Scott Anderson : Replying to "Item #1, PR-2024-010..." 1+14+7+6+10+9+9+13+12+33+14+23 09:55:29 From Jacob Boylan : Planning Condition: An approved site lighting plan meeting the standards and specifications outlined in section 5-8 of the IDO is required to be submitted along with the final site plan sheets before the site plan can be distributed for DFT staff to sign. 09:56:05 From Jacob Boylan : *An IIA-Infrastructure Improvements Agreement with a financial guarantee will be required prior to final signoff of the site plan. 09:56:57 From Hannah Shea-Parks & Recreation : Conditions of approval for case #2 PR-2025-020137 DFT 12.10.2025 : -Final updated landscape plan showing street tree calculations and acceptable tree species to be approved by City Forestry. Preserved and protected cottonwood trees to be called out on the plans (per City Forestry’s provided exhibit) 09:58:57 From Jay Rodenbeck : Finding for #2, PR-2025-020137: A visualization depicting the proposed development against the Sandia Mountains confirming the VPO requirements are met is suggested. 09:59:14 From Robyn Rose : Reacted to "Finding: A visualiza..." with 👍 10:03:12 From Hannah Shea-Parks & Recreation : - Conditions of approval for case #1 PR-2024-010887 DFT 12.10.2025 -An updated landscape plan must be provided. Street trees are required along Bridge Blvd SW no less than 20’ from back of curb and spaced 25’ O.C. Tree species must be approved by City Forestry. -Details showing the wall design along Battan Dr. must be provided and must be approved by Parks and Recreation due to adjacency to a City park. -Compliance with 5-6(G) Screening of Mechanical Equipment and Support Areas, must be confirmed with Parks and Recreation department. 10:03:50 From Marcelo Ibarra-COA Planning : If infrastructure is needed, an IL-Infrastructure list, and/or IIA-Infrastructure Improvements Agreement with financial guarantee will be required. 10:04:47 From Marcelo Ibarra-COA Planning : Condition of approval for case #1 10:04:50 From Marcelo Ibarra-COA Planning : PR-2024-010887 10:11:55 From Jay Rodenbeck : Planning condition of approval for #1, PR-2024-010887: Correct the parking calculations on the Site Plan 10:12:19 From Jay Rodenbeck : The current case being discussed is item #3, PR-2025-020144 10:14:40 From Jay Rodenbeck : The current case being discussed is item #4, PR-2025-020138 10:22:24 From Antoni Montoya : antonimontoya@cabq.gov 10:26:19 From Jay Rodenbeck : The current case being discussed is item #5, PR-2019-002677 10:30:06 From Anthony Montoya : Hydrology needs to approve the Grading & Drainage Plan prior to Building Permit per the originally approved grading and drainage plan (HT#H17D097) with the engineer’s stamp date of 07/05/2021 for this development. 10:33:24 From Jay Rodenbeck : jppalmer@cabq.gov: Jeff Palmer, Code Enforcement 10:43:23 From Jay Rodenbeck : The current case being discussed is item #8, PR-2024-010931 10:56:00 From Jay Rodenbeck : The current case being discussed is item #9, PR-2025-020153 11:41:55 From Anthony Montoya : Add a Cross Lot Drainage Easement note specifying the beneficiary and maintenance agreement.  Comment – Prior to submitting for Building Permit, a licensed New Mexico civil engineer will need to submit a Grading & Drainage Plan to Hydrology for review & approval if one of these conditions is met. (500 cy of grading, 1,000 sf of proposed building, or 10,000 sf of proposed paving). 11:47:59 From Anthony Montoya : Easement language sent to Ryan Curley 11:58:53 From Jay Rodenbeck : The current case being discussed is item #14, PR-2025-020147 12:13:47 From Robert Webb : https://www.cabq.gov/planning/urban-design-development/current-planning-section -- Current Planning for pre-app assistance 12:15:04 From Jay Rodenbeck : The current case being discussed is item #6, PR-2025-020156 12:23:10 From Jay Rodenbeck : The current case being discussed is item #7, PR-2025-020155 12:29:24 From Jay Rodenbeck : The current case being discussed is item #12, PR-2025-020158 12:36:28 From Jacob Boylan : TotaTotal Acreage1.734Total Average0.158.75 of AVG0.1181.25 of AVG0.197l Acreage1.734Total Average0.158.75 of AVG0.1181.25 of AVG0.197 12:36:37 From Jacob Boylan : Total Acreage 1.734 Total Average 0.158 .75 of AVG 0.118 1.25 of AVG 0.197